Mila kula anganggit sêrat punika, supados kawontênanipun têtuwuhan tuwin oyod-oyodan ingkang kathah paedahipun, sagêda kasumêrêpan ing akathah, dene ingkang kula wastani têtuwuhan wau kathah ingkang kaanggêp rêrungkudan kemawon, inggih lêrês ngantos sapriki jampi Jawi sampun kangge, ananging kadospundi kanggenipun sarta rekanipun angangge jampi wau, makatên ugi namanipun tanêman ingkang kangge jampi asring kadamêl wados, mila pangupadosipun katêrangan bab jampi-jampi Jawi asring botên sagêd kadugèn, sarta kawruh bab jampi-jampi wau asring ical sarêng ingkang gadhah kawruh wau tilar ing donya, awit kawruhipun dipun damêl wados.

Selasa, 28 Juni 2011

Farmakognosi - 生药学 - Pharmacognosy

Farmakognosi - 生药学 - Pharmacognosy


Farmakognosi

 Farmakognosi merupakan salah satu ilmu yang mempelajari tentang bagian-bagian tanaman atau hewan yang dapat digunakan sebagai obat alami yang telah melewati berbagai macam uji seperti uji farmakodinamik, uji toksikologi dan uji biofarmasetika.
Farmakognosi berasal dari dua kata Yunani yaitu Pharmakon (obat) dan Gnosis (ilmu/pengetahuan). Jadi farmakognosi adalah ilmu pengetahuan tentang obat, khususnya dari nabati, hewani dan mineral. Definisi yang mencakup seluruh ruang lingkup farmakognosi diberikan oleh Fluckiger, yaitu pengetahuan secara serentak berbagai macam cabang ilmu pengetahuan untuk memperoleh segala segi yang perlu diketahui tentang obat.

Sejarah dan Perkembangan Farmakognasi


Pada kurang lebih 2500 tahun SM, penggunaan tanaman obat sudah digunakan orang, hal ini dapat diketahui dari lempeng tanah liat yang tersimpan di perpustakaan Ashurbanipal di Assiria, yang memuat simplisia antara lain kulit delima, opium, adas manis, madu, ragi, minyak jarak. Seorang tabib telah mengenal kayu manis hiosiamina, gentiana, kelembak, gom arab dan bunga kantil.

Pada tahun 1737 linnaeus, seorang ahli botani swedia, menulis buku “Genera Plantarum” yang kemudian menjadi buku pedoman utama dari sistematik botani, sedangkan farmakognosi modern mulai dirintis oleh Martiuss, seorang Apoteker jerman dalam bukunya “Grundriss Der Pharmakognosie Des Planzenreisches” telah menggolongkan simplisia menurut segi morfologi, cara-cara untuk mengetahui kemurnian simplisia.

Farmakognosi mulai berkembang pesat setelah pertengahan abad ke 19 dan masih terbatas pada uraian makroskopis dan mikroskopis, dan sampai dewasa ini perkembanganya sudah sampai ke usaha-usaha isolasi, identifikasi dan juga teknik-teknik kromatografi untuk tujuan analisa kualitatif dan kuantitatif.




Pharmacognosy



Dioscorides Materia Medica, c. 1334 copy in Arabic, describes medicinal features of various plants.

Pharmacognosy is the study of medicines derived from natural sources. The American Society of Pharmacognosy defines pharmacognosy as "the study of the physical, chemical, biochemical and biological properties of drugs, drug substances or potential drugs or drug substances of natural origin as well as the search for new drugs from natural sources."[1]

Contents

Introduction

The word "pharmacognosy" is derived from the Greek words φάρμακον pharmakon (drug), and γνῶσις gnosis or "knowledge". The term pharmacognosy was used for the first time by the Austrian physician Schmidt in 1811 and 1815 by Crr. Anotheus Seydler in a work titled Analecta Pharmacognostica..
Originally—during the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century—"pharmacognosy" was used to define the branch of medicine or commodity sciences (Warenkunde in German) which deals with drugs in their crude, or unprepared, form. Crude drugs are the dried, unprepared material of plant, animal or mineral origin, used for medicine. The study of these materials under the name pharmakognosie was first developed in German-speaking areas of Europe, while other language areas often used the older term materia medica taken from the works of Galen and Dioscorides. In German the term drogenkunde ("science of crude drugs") is also used synonymously.
As late as the beginning of the 20th century, the subject had developed mainly on the botanical side, being particularly concerned with the description and identification of drugs both in their whole state and in powder form. Such branches of pharmacognosy are still of fundamental importance, particularly for pharmacopoeial identification and quality control purposes, but rapid development in other areas has enormously expanded the subject.
Although most pharmacognostic studies focus on plants and medicines derived from plants, other types of organisms are also regarded as pharmacognostically interesting, in particular, various types of microbes (bacteria, fungi, etc.), and, recently, various marine organisms.
According to quackwatch pharmacognosy is "the science of medicines from natural sources".[2] Other definitions are more encompassing, drawing on a broad spectrum of biological subjects, including botany, ethnobotany, medical anthropology, marine biology, microbiology, herbal medicine, chemistry, biotechnology, phytochemistry, pharmacology, pharmaceutics, clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice.
The contemporary study of pharmacognosy can be divided into the fields of
  • medical ethnobotany: the study of the traditional use of plants for medicinal purposes;
  • ethnopharmacology: the study of the pharmacological qualities of traditional medicinal substances;
  • the study of phytotherapy (the medicinal use of plant extracts); and
  • phytochemistry, the study of chemicals derived from plants (including the identification of new drug candidates derived from plant sources).
  • zoopharmacognosy, the process by which animals self-medicate, by selecting and using plants, soils, and insects to treat and prevent disease.
  • marine pharmacognosy, the study of chemicals derived from marine organisms.
At the 9th congress of Italian society of pharmacognosy it was stated that current return of phyto-therapy was clearly reflected by the increased market of such products. In 1998 the latest figures available for Europe, the total OTC market for herbal medicinal products reached a figure of $6 billion, with consumption for Germany of $2.5 billion, France $1.6 billion and Italy $600 million. In the US, where the use of herbal products has never been as prevalent as in continental Europe, the market for all herb sales reached a peak in 1998 of $700 billion. This welcomed the scientific investigation of a rigorous nature.
The plant kingdom still holds many species of plants containing substances of medicinal value which have yet to be discovered. Large numbers of plants are constantly being screened for their possible pharmacological value.

Issues in phytotherapy

The part of pharmacognosy focusing on use of crude extracts or semi-pure mixtures originating from nature, namely phytotherapy, is probably the best known and also the most debated area in pharmacognosy. Although phytotherapy is sometimes considered as alternative medicine, when critically conducted, it can be considered the scientific study on the effects and clinical use of herbal medicines.

Constituents and drug synergysm

One characteristic of crude drug material is that constituents may have an opposite, moderating or enhancing effect. Hence, the final effect of any crude drug material will be a product of the interactions between the constituents and the effect of each constituent on its own. To effectively study the existence and affect of such interactions, scientific studies must examine the effect that multiple constituents, given concurrently, have on the system. Herbalists assert that as phytopharmaceuticals rely upon synergy for their activities, plants with high levels of active constituents like ginsenosides or hypericin may not correlate with the strength of the herbs. In phytopharmaceutical or herbal medicine, the therapeutic effects of herbs cannot be determined unless its active ingredient or cofactors are identified or the herb is administered as a whole. One way to indicate strength is standardization to one or several marker compound that are believed to be mainly responsible for the biological effects. However many herbalists believe that the active ingredient in a plant is the plant itself.[3]

Herb and drug interactions

A study of herb drug interactions indicated that the vast majority of drug interactions occurred in four classes of drugs, the chief class being blood thinners, but also including protease inhibitors, cardiac glycosides and the immuno-suppressant ciclosporin.[4] [5]

Natural products chemistry

Most bioactive compounds of natural origin are secondary metabolites, i.e., species-specific chemical agents that can be grouped into various categories[citation needed]. A typical protocol to isolate a pure chemical agent from natural origin is bioassay-guided fractionation, meaning step-by-step separation of extracted components based on differences in their physicochemical properties, and assessing the biological activity, followed by next round of separation and assaying. Typically, such work is initiated after a given crude drug formulation (typically prepared by solvent extraction of the natural material) is deemed "active" in a particular in vitro assay. If the end-goal of the work at hand is to identify which one(s) of the scores or hundreds of compounds are responsible for the observed in vitro activity, the path to that end is fairly straightforward: 1. fractionate the crude extract, e.g. by solvent partitioning or chromatography. 2. test the fractions thereby generated with in vitro assay. 3. repeat steps 1) and 2) until pure, active compounds are obtained. 4. determine structure(s) of active compound(s), typically by using spectroscopic methods. In vitro activity does not necessarily translate to activity in humans or other living systems. The most common means for fractionation are solvent-solvent partitioning and chromatographic techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), medium-pressure liquid chromatography, "flash" chromatography, open-column chromatography, vacuum-liquid chromatography (VLC), thin-layer chromatography (TLC), with each technique being most appropriate for a given amount of starting material. Countercurrent chromatography (CCC) is particularly well-suited for bioassay-guided fractionation because, as an all-liquid separation technique, concern about irreversible loss or denaturation of active sample components is minimized. After isolation of a pure substance, the task of elucidating its chemical structure can be addressed. For this purpose, the most powerful methodologies available are nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS)[citation needed]. In the case of drug discovery efforts, structure elucidation of all components that are active in vitro is typically the end goal. In the case of phytotherapy research, the investigator may use in vitro BAGF as a tool to identify pharmacologically interesting or important components of the crude drug. The work does not stop after structural identification of in vitro actives, however. The task of "dissecting and reassembling" the crude drug one active component at a time, in order to achieve a mechanistic understanding of how it works in phytotherapy, is quite daunting. This is because it is simply too difficult, from cost, time, regulatory, and even scientific perspectives, to study experimental fractions of the crude drug in humans. In vitro assays are therefore used to identify chemical components of the crude drug that may rationally be expected to have a given pharmacological effect in humans, and to provide a rational basis for standardization of a crude drug formulation to be tested in [and sold/marketed to] humans.

Loss of biodiversity

Farnsworth for example, has found that 25% of all prescriptions dispensed from community pharmacies in the United States from 1959 to 1980 contained active ingredients extracted from higher plants. In some countries in Asia and Africa 80% of the population relies on traditional medicine (including herbal medicine) for primary health care.[6] Constituents of substances used by traditional healers, have rarely been incorporated into modern medicine. Quinine, physostigmine, d-tubocurarine, pilocarpine and ephedrine, have been demonstrated to have active effects[7] Knowledge of traditional medicinal practices is fast disappearing(?), particularly in the Amazon, as native healers die out and are replaced by more modern medical practitioners. Botanists and pharmacologists are racing to learn these ancient practices[citation needed], which, like the forest plants they employ, are also endangered[8][9][10]
An explanation for some species loss is habitat lost due to invasive species introduction. Herbalist David Winston has suggested that a high proportion of nonnative species seen as invasive (kudzu, Japanese knotweed, mimosa, lonicera, St. Johnswort and purple loosestrife) may be harvested for the domestic herbal medicine market.[11]
Species extinction is not only due to habitat loss. Overharvesting of medicinal species of plants and animals also contributes to species loss. This is particularly notable in the matter of Traditional Chinese Medicine where crude drugs of plant and animal origin are used with increasing demand. People with a stake in TCM often seek chemical and biological alternatives to endangered species because they realize that plants and animals lost from the wild are also lost to medicine forever but different cultural attitudes bedevil conservation efforts[citation needed]. Still conservation is not a new idea: Chinese advice against overexploitation of natural medicinal species dates from at least Mencius, a philosopher living in the 4th century BC[citation needed].
Cooperation between western conservationists and practitioners have been beset by cultural difficulties. Westerners may emphasise urgency in matters of conservation, while Chinese may wish for the products used in TCM to remain publicly available. One repeated fallacy[citation needed] is that rhinoceros horn is used as an aphrodisiac in TCM. It is, in fact, prescribed for fevers and convulsions by TCM practitioners. There are no peer-reviewed studies showing that this treatment is effective.[12] In 1995 representatives of the oriental medicine communities in Asia met with conservationists at a symposium in Hong Kong, organized by TRAFFIC. The two groups established a clear willingness to cooperate through dialogue and mutual understanding. This has led to several meetings, including the 1997 First International Symposium on Endangered Species Used in Traditional East Asian Medicine where China was among 136 nations to sign a formal resolution recognizing that the uncontrolled use of wild species in traditional medicine threatens their survival and the continuation of these medical practices. The resolution, drawn up by the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), aims to initiate new partnerships in conservation.[13]

Sustainable sources of plant and animal drugs

As species face loss of habitat or overharvesting, there have been new issues to deal with in sourcing crude drugs. These include changes to the herb from farming practices, substitution of species or other plants altogether, adulteration and cross-pollination issues. For instance, ginseng which is field farmed may have significant problems with fungus, making contamination with fungicides an issue. This may be remedied with woods grown programs, but they are insufficient to produce enough ginseng to meet demand. The wildcrafted echinacea, black cohosh and American ginseng often rely upon old growth root, often in excess of 50 years of age and it is not clear that younger stock will have the same pharmaceutical effect.[14] Black cohosh may be adulterated with the related Chinese actea species, which is not the same. Ginseng may be replaced by ginseniodes from Jiaogulan which has been stated to have a different effect than the full panax root.[15]
The problem may be exacerbated by the growth of pills and capsules as the preferred method of ingesting medication as they are cheaper and more available than traditional, individually tailored prescriptions of raw medicinals but the contents are harder to track. Seahorses are a case in point: Seahorses once had to be of a certain size and quality before they were accepted by practitioners and consumers. But declining availability of the preferred large, pale and smooth seahorses has been offset by the shift towards prepackaged medicines, which make it possible for TCM merchants to sell previously unused juvenile, spiny and dark-coloured animals. Today almost a third of the seahorses sold in China are prepackaged. [16]
The farming of plant or animal species, used for medicinal purposes has caused difficulties. Rob Parry Jones and Amanda Vincent write:
  • One solution is to farm medicinal animals and plants. Chinese officials have promoted this as a way of guaranteeing supplies as well as protecting endangered species. And there have been some successes—notably with plant species, such as American ginseng—which is used as a general tonic and for chronic coughs. Red deer, too, have for centuries been farmed for their antlers, which are used to treat impotence and general fatigue. But growing your own is not a universal panacea. Some plants grow so slowly that cultivation in not economically viable. Animals such as musk deer may be difficult to farm, and so generate little profit. Seahorses are difficult to feed and plagued by disease in captivity. Other species cannot be cultivated at all. Even when it works, farming usually fails to match the scale of demand. Overall, cultivated TCM plants in China supply less than 20 per cent of the required 1.6 million tonnes per annum. Similarly, China's demand for animal products such as musk and pangolin scales far exceeds supply from captive-bred sources.
  • Farming alone can never resolve conservation concerns, as government authorities and those who use Chinese medicine realise. For a start, consumers often prefer ingredients taken from the wild, believing them to be more potent. This is reflected in the price, with wild oriental ginseng fetching up to 32 times as much as cultivated plants. Then there are welfare concerns. Bear farming in China is particularly controversial. Around 7600 captive bears have their bile "milked" through tubes inserted into their gall bladders. The World Society for the Protection of Animals states that bear farming is surrounded by "appalling levels of cruelty and neglect".[17] Chinese officials state that 10 000 wild bears would need to be killed each year to produce as much bile, making bear farming the more desirable option. The World society for the Protection of Animals, however, states that "it is commonly believed in China that the bile from a wild bear is the most potent, and so farming bears for their bile cannot replace the demand for the product extracted from wild animals".
  • One alternative to farming involves replacing medical ingredients from threatened species with manufactured chemical compounds. In general, this sort of substitution is difficult to achieve because the active ingredient is often not known. In addition, most TCM users believe that TCM compounds may act synergistically so several ingredients may interact to give the required effect. Thus TCM users often people prefer the wild source. Tauro ursodeoxycholic acid, the active ingredient of bear bile, can be synthesised and is used by some Western doctors to treat gallstones, but many TCM consumers reject it as being inferior to the natural substance from wild animals.[16]

Acceptance in the United States

In the US pharmacognosy has been long lumped together with quack herbalism by both proponents and opponents. Traditional herbalism is regarded as a method of alternative medicine and considered suspect since the Flexner Report of 1910 led to the closing of the eclectic medical schools where botanical medicine was exclusively practiced.
This situation is further complicated by most pharmacognostic studies in the latter part of the 20th Century having been published in languages other than English such as German, Dutch, Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Persian. Some of the important botanicals have been incorporated into the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determinations of drug safety. In 1994, US Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), regulating labeling and sales of herbs and other supplements. Most of the 2000 US companies making herbal or natural products[18] choose to market their products as food supplements that do not require substantial testing and give no assurance of safety and effectivity.

External links

References

  1. ^ The American Society of Pharmacognosy
  2. ^ http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/paraherbalism.html
  3. ^ 1992, American Herbalism edited by Michael Tierra Crossings Press
  4. ^ Butterweek, Derendorf, et al. PHARMACOKINETIC HERB-DRUG INTERACTIONS: Are Preventive Screenings Necessary and Appropriate. Planta Medica 2004:70:784-791
  5. ^ Thieme-connect - Abstract
  6. ^ "Traditional Medicine." World Health Organization web site. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs134/en/index.html. Accessed on 3/12/09.
  7. ^ Farnsworth NR, Akerele O, Bingel AS, et al. Medicinal plants in therapy. Bull World Health Organ 1985; 63: 965-981
  8. ^ Farnsworth, NR. The role of ethnopharmacology in drug development. In: Anonymous. , editor. Bioactive Compounds from Plants. Ciba Foundation Symposium 154. Wiley Interscience, New York; 1990.
  9. ^ Farnsworth NR. Screening plants for new medicines. Wilson EO, Peters FM, editors. Biodiversity. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1988: 83-97.
  10. ^ Balick, MJ. Ethnobotany and the identification of therapeutic agents from the rainforest. In: Anonymous. , editor. Bioactive Compounds. Ciba Foundation Symposium 154. Wiley Interscience, New York; 1990. pp. 22–31.
  11. ^ [1] David Winston. American Extra Pharmacopoeia
  12. ^ Chinese Herbal Medicine: Materia Medica, Third Edition by Dan Bensky, Steven Clavey, Erich Stoger, and Andrew Gamble. September 2004
  13. ^ [2]Can we tame wild medicine? To save a rare species, Western conservationists may have to make their peace with traditional Chinese medicine. Rob Parry-Jones and Amanda Vincent New Scientist vol 157 issue 2115 - 3 January 1998, page 26
  14. ^ http://www.rrreading.com/files/Life%20Span%20of%20Medicinal%20Plants.pdf
  15. ^ Jialiu Liu and Michael Blumert. JiaogulanTorchlight Publishing. 1999,
  16. ^ a b Project Seahorse | Can we tame wild medicine?
  17. ^ The Trade in Bear Bile: Courtesy of World Society for the Protection of Animals
  18. ^ Whole Foods Magazine



生药学

 
生药学Pharmacognosy)指以生药为主要研究对象,对生药的名称、来源(基源)、生产(栽培)、采制(采集、加工、炮制)、鉴定(真伪鉴别和品质评价)、化学成分、医疗用途、组织培养、资源开发与利用和新药创制等的学问。換句話說,生药学是利用本草学植物学动物学化学药理学医学分子生物学等知識研究天然药物应用的学科。

目录


历史


西方

在十九世纪初叶以前,世界上的药物皆取自自然界的三大自然物——動物植物礦物德国学者卡爾·馮·馬修斯提出了「生药学」的概念。他认为生药学是商品学的一部分,是研究从自然界所得到的药物的来源和品质,试验其纯度,检查其混杂物或伪品的学问。随着许多化合物被从植物中分离出纯品,药物的生理作用研究也逐渐深入,进入20世纪后,药物作用强度的生物测定方法也逐步成熟。1960年以后现代仪器分析技术迅速发展,并很快在生药鉴定中应用。

中國

生药学在中国起源于本草学,本草学得名于中国汉代某不知名作者假托上古神农氏之名所做的本草学专著《神农本草經》。《神农本草經》共录有药物365种是中国最早的生藥學著作;南北朝医学家陶弘景总结整理了四卷本《神农本草》著三卷本《神农本草经》并著录《神农本草经集注》七卷,《集注》包括了各类药物700余种。公元659年苏敬等人著录《新修本草》20卷,并附图经7卷,药图25卷《新修本草》因其官方性质而成为世界上第一部药典,《新修本草》亦称《唐本草》是中国本草学发展的一个里程碑;中国明代著名的医学家和药学家李时珍著录中国本草学中最重要的一部专著《本草纲目》52卷,共录有药物1892种,《本草纲目》是中国本草学的集大成者,标志着中国本草学的发展走向顶峰。
近代生药学经由日本取經於德國,後經中國學者趙燏黃於1905年留學日本,回國時帶回「生藥學」一詞,並开啟了对中國傳統醫學對所使用的生药等的现代化研究。

生药学與中藥學的差異

生药学的研究範疇包含了對世界各國所使用傳統醫學的藥物及民間藥等所進行的研究,而中药学主要是中國政府為弘揚中國传统醫學理论所使用的藥物研究近代所提出的稱謂,如同世界衛生組織(WHO)對傳統醫學中的印度醫學阿拉伯醫學所進行的生藥學研究一般,“中藥學”、“印藥學”、“阿藥學”基本上都屬於生藥學研究的分支。

研究與應用

為使療效確實與發現天然藥物對現代疾病的新應用,生藥學研究在今日顯得更為重要。且生藥學研究因涉及之範圍廣泛,而在研究時更有其一定程序與傳承:即首先要進行歷代諸家本草之本草考察 (包括名稱之考訂,歷代本草文獻中所傳承,每一生藥之性狀、藥效及產地之考察),其次要進行者為市場品之收集(包括同名異物及市場品來自何地之產地調查)。接著進行生藥學研究以確定市場品之基原(植物性生藥、動物性生藥、必須確定其基原植物和基原動物,礦物性生藥要確定其成分及防範異物之摻入,如石膏中鉛之含量需在20PPM以下),並將市場品就其性狀、臭、味、顯微鏡下之化學反應及構造、粉末及內含物特徵予於繪圖加以記載,以製訂真偽品之鑑別規格,便於品質管制。提交生藥化學家研究其有效成分並決定其構造式,如此一面可提供生藥藥理學家進行具備生理活性成分之篩檢並朝新藥開發之路發展,另一面更可解明該生藥之全部療效及毒性。確定臨床及其他醫療用途並掌握優質生藥後,則可朝生產方向發展,或利用生物科技中組織培養之技術栽培,同時在GMP生產過程中重視重金屬與農藥殘留問題,另一面將優質生藥按照中外漢方成方典籍(如日本厚生省頒布之二百一十處方)之成方比例在講究溶劑及賦形劑之下製成各種生藥濃縮製劑或其他劑形(如小柴胡湯葛根湯……)等以提供生藥應用之專家使用。
換言之,生藥學是研究一系列生藥的嚴謹科學。從神農本草經以降之歷代諸家本草中所收載的生藥若非有新增品,便有新療效的發明,這與美國生藥學家 H.W.Youngken(1951)說過的名言"The Pharmacognosy is as old and modern as the civilization"意即「生藥學與文明同新舊」不謀而合。這名言足可解釋神農本草經(AD22~250)乃後漢時代文明的代表也是神農本草經時代的生藥學水準,而本草綱目也代表著明萬曆時代的生藥學水準;這也意味著「不分中外的藥學演進史都是生藥學的發展史」,各種族理論論述之天然藥物皆應稱為生藥,而生藥之應用乃與全人類文明之歷史同新舊。
當吾人通過古今中外本草典籍所記載之生藥及其應用並結合現代科學的研究成果時,便能使古老「方、證」與現代醫學「病」的觀點溝通,當融合「方、證、病」三者時即能從容應對新時代中新疾病的挑戰。 

生药鉴定

生药鉴定就是依据国家药典、有关资料规定或有关专著对生药作真实性、纯度及品质优良度的检定,以保证生药品种的真实性、用药的安全有效及发掘利用新药源。主要方法有原植物鉴定、性状特征、显微鉴别、理化鉴定等。

生药学家


参见条目








Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar